lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 09:05:16 +0000
From:   Sandipan Patra <spatra@...dia.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC:     Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "kamil@...as.org" <kamil@...as.org>,
        "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bibek Basu <bbasu@...dia.com>,
        Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: pwm-fan: Add profile support and add remove
 module support

Hi Uwe,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 12:35 PM
> To: Sandipan Patra <spatra@...dia.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>; Jonathan Hunter
> <jonathanh@...dia.com>; kamil@...as.org; jdelvare@...e.com; linux@...ck-
> us.net; robh+dt@...nel.org; Bibek Basu <bbasu@...dia.com>; Bitan Biswas
> <bbiswas@...dia.com>; linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> hwmon@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> tegra@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: pwm-fan: Add profile support and add remove
> module support
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:36:04AM +0530, Sandipan Patra wrote:
> > This change has 2 parts:
> > 1. Add support for profiles mode settings.
> >     This allows different fan settings for trip point temp/hyst/pwm.
> >     T194 has multiple fan-profiles support.
> >
> > 2. Add pwm-fan remove support. This is essential since the config is
> >     tristate capable.
> 
> These two are orthogonal, aren't they? So they belong in two patches.
> 
> You have to expand the binding documentation.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Sandipan Patra <spatra@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 112
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c index
> > 30b7b3e..26db589 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> > @@ -3,8 +3,10 @@
> >   * pwm-fan.c - Hwmon driver for fans connected to PWM lines.
> >   *
> >   * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, NVIDIA Corporation.
> >   *
> >   * Author: Kamil Debski <k.debski@...sung.com>
> > + * Author: Sandipan Patra <spatra@...dia.com>
> >   */
> >
> >  #include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > @@ -21,6 +23,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/timer.h>
> >
> >  #define MAX_PWM 255
> > +/* Based on OF max device tree node name length */
> > +#define MAX_PROFILE_NAME_LENGTH      31
> >
> >  struct pwm_fan_ctx {
> >       struct mutex lock;
> > @@ -38,6 +42,12 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
> >       unsigned int pwm_fan_state;
> >       unsigned int pwm_fan_max_state;
> >       unsigned int *pwm_fan_cooling_levels;
> > +
> > +     unsigned int pwm_fan_profiles;
> > +     const char **fan_profile_names;
> > +     unsigned int **fan_profile_cooling_levels;
> > +     unsigned int fan_current_profile;
> > +
> >       struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;  };
> >
> > @@ -227,28 +237,86 @@ static int pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(struct
> device *dev,
> >                                      struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx)  {
> >       struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > +     struct device_node *base_profile = NULL;
> > +     struct device_node *profile_np = NULL;
> > +     const char *default_profile = NULL;
> >       int num, i, ret;
> >
> > -     if (!of_find_property(np, "cooling-levels", NULL))
> > -             return 0;
> > +     num = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "cooling-levels");
> > +     if (num <= 0) {
> > +             base_profile = of_get_child_by_name(np, "profiles");
> > +             if (!base_profile) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev, "Wrong Data\n");
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (base_profile) {
> > +             ctx->pwm_fan_profiles =
> > +                     of_get_available_child_count(base_profile);
> > +
> > +             if (ctx->pwm_fan_profiles <= 0) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev, "Profiles used but not defined\n");
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
> >
> > -     ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "cooling-levels");
> > -     if (ret <= 0) {
> > -             dev_err(dev, "Wrong data!\n");
> > -             return ret ? : -EINVAL;
> > +             ctx->fan_profile_names = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> > +                     sizeof(const char *) * ctx->pwm_fan_profiles,
> > +                                                     GFP_KERNEL);
> > +             ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> > +                     sizeof(int *) * ctx->pwm_fan_profiles,
> > +                                                     GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > +             if (!ctx->fan_profile_names
> > +                             || !ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels)
> > +                     return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +             ctx->fan_current_profile = 0;
> > +             i = 0;
> > +             for_each_available_child_of_node(base_profile, profile_np) {
> > +                     num = of_property_count_u32_elems(profile_np,
> > +                                                     "cooling-levels");
> > +                     if (num <= 0) {
> > +                             dev_err(dev, "No data in cooling-levels inside profile
> node!\n");
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
> > +                     }
> > +
> > +                     of_property_read_string(profile_np, "name",
> > +                                             &ctx->fan_profile_names[i]);
> > +                     if (default_profile &&
> > +                             !strncmp(default_profile,
> > +                             ctx->fan_profile_names[i],
> > +                             MAX_PROFILE_NAME_LENGTH))
> > +                             ctx->fan_current_profile = i;
> > +
> > +                     ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels[i] =
> > +                             devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(int) * num,
> > +                                                     GFP_KERNEL);
> > +                     if (!ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels[i])
> > +                             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +                     of_property_read_u32_array(profile_np, "cooling-levels",
> > +                             ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels[i], num);
> > +                     i++;
> > +             }
> >       }
> >
> > -     num = ret;
> >       ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(u32),
> >                                                  GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -     ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "cooling-levels",
> > -                                      ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels, num);
> > -     if (ret) {
> > -             dev_err(dev, "Property 'cooling-levels' cannot be read!\n");
> > -             return ret;
> > +     if (base_profile) {
> > +             memcpy(ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels,
> > +               ctx->fan_profile_cooling_levels[ctx->fan_current_profile],
> > +                                             num);
> > +     } else {
> > +             ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "cooling-levels",
> > +                             ctx->pwm_fan_cooling_levels, num);
> > +             if (ret) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev, "Property 'cooling-levels' cannot be read!\n");
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
> >       }
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> > @@ -390,6 +458,25 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int pwm_fan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +     struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +     struct pwm_args args;
> > +
> > +     if (!ctx)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THERMAL))
> > +             thermal_cooling_device_unregister(ctx->cdev);
> > +
> > +     pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &args);
> > +     pwm_config(ctx->pwm, 0, args.period);
> > +     pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
> 
> What is what you really here? Is it only that the PWM stops oscillating, or is it
> crucial that the output goes to its inactive level?
> 
> (The intended semantic of pwm_disable includes that the output goes low, but
> not all implementations enforce this.)
> 
> Also please don't introduce new users of pwm_config() and pwm_disable() use
> pwm_apply() instead.
> 
> I wonder if this unregistration is "safe". When the driver is in use I'd expect that
> the hwmon device doesn't go away and so the devm unregistration callback that
> belongs to
> devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups() blocks. But at this time the PWM
> is already stopped and so the device stops functioning earlier.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

Thanks for reviewing the changes.

I see that pwm_fan_shutdown() which has got merged recently, can also be used for
module remove functionality. May be it will need a little bit of tweak in the code.
However I should have not made both multiple profiles support and fan remove functionality on
same patch.

For now I will prepare the current patch only to handle multiple profiles and corresponding
device tree settings.


Thanks & Regards,
Sandipan

> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ