lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 10:19:17 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "dillon.minfei@...il.com" <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Enable ili9341 and l3gd20 on stm32f429-disco

On Mon, 25 May 2020 11:45:40 +0800, dillon.minfei@...il.com wrote:
> V5's update based on Mark Brown's suggestion, use 'SPI_MASTER_MUST_RX'
> for SPI_SIMPLEX_RX mode on stm32 spi controller.
> 
> V5:
> 1 instead of add send dummy data out under SIMPLEX_RX mode,
>    add flags 'SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX' for stm32 spi driver
> 2 bypass 'SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX' and 'SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_RX' under
> 'SPI_3WIRE' mode
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: stm32: Add 'SPI_SIMPLEX_RX', 'SPI_3WIRE_RX' support for stm32f4
      commit: 61367d0b8f5edf5146059ba8b79ce4e4485340b2
[2/2] spi: flags 'SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_RX' and 'SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX' can't be coexit with 'SPI_3WIRE' mode
      commit: aee67fe879e5030a2f5e1d9af3cb5b2a1027e78a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ