[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <872737c7e0690df3f42103365c651ad4@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:06:41 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2@...wei.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
catalin.marinas@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, suzuki.poulose@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yuzhao@...gle.com, Dave.Martin@....com, steven.price@....com,
broonie@...nel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, arm@...nel.org,
xiexiangyou@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, kuhn.chenqun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: Detect the ARMv8.4 TTL feature
On 2020-05-26 07:40, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> On 2020/5/26 10:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11557359/) is adding
>> some
>> more ID_AA64MMFR2 features including the TTL. I am going to respin
>> parts
>> of the V4 series patches along with the above mentioned patch. So
>> please
>> rebase this series accordingly, probably on latest next.
No. Please.
>>
>
> I noticed that some patches of your series have been merged into arm64
> tree (for-next/cpufeature), such as TLB range, but this one not. Why?
>
> BTW, this patch is provided by Marc in his NV series [1], maybe you
> should also let him know.
>
> I will rebase my series after your patch is merged.
Please don't rebase on -next. That's the worse thing to do. Always base
your series on a well known -rc, and stick to that. Maintainers can
always do the rebase and resolve conflicts.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists