| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200526123424.GF1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 13:34:24 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, drjones@...hat.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 7/9] kvm/arm64: Support async page fault
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:17PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> There are two stages of fault pages and the stage one page fault is
> handled by guest itself. The guest is trapped to host when the page
> fault is caused by stage 2 page table, for example missing. The guest
> is suspended until the requested page is populated. To populate the
> requested page can be related to IO activities if the page was swapped
> out previously. In this case, the guest has to suspend for a few of
> milliseconds at least, regardless of the overall system load. There
> is no useful work done during the suspended period from guest's view.
This is a bit difficult to read. How about:
| When a vCPU triggers a Stage-2 fault (e.g. when accessing a page that
| is not mapped at Stage-2), the vCPU is suspended until the host has
| handled the fault. It can take the host milliseconds or longer to
| handle the fault as this may require IO, and when the system load is
| low neither the host nor guest perform useful work during such
| periods.
>
> This adds asychornous page fault to improve the situation. A signal
Nit: typo for `asynchronous` here, and there are a few other typos in
the patch itself. It would be nice if you could run a spellcheck over
that.
> (PAGE_NOT_PRESENT) is sent to guest if the requested page needs some time
> to be populated. Guest might reschedule to another running process if
> possible. Otherwise, the vCPU is put into power-saving mode, which is
> actually to cause vCPU reschedule from host's view. A followup signal
> (PAGE_READY) is sent to guest once the requested page is populated.
> The suspended task is waken up or scheduled when guest receives the
> signal. With this mechanism, the vCPU won't be stuck when the requested
> page is being populated by host.
It would probably be best to say 'notification' rather than 'signal'
here, and say 'the guest is notified', etc. As above, it seems that this
is per-vCPU, so it's probably better to say 'vCPU' rather than guest, to
make it clear which context this applies to.
>
> There are more details highlighted as below. Note the implementation is
> similar to what x86 has to some extent:
>
> * A dedicated SMCCC ID is reserved to enable, disable or configure
> the functionality. The only 64-bits parameter is conveyed by two
> registers (w2/w1). Bits[63:56] is the bitmap used to specify the
> operated functionality like enabling/disabling/configuration. The
> bits[55:6] is the physical address of control block or external
> data abort injection disallowed region. Bit[5:0] are used to pass
> control flags.
>
> * Signal (PAGE_NOT_PRESENT) is sent to guest if the requested page
> isn't ready. In the mean while, a work is started to populate the
> page asynchronously in background. The stage 2 page table entry is
> updated accordingly and another signal (PAGE_READY) is fired after
> the request page is populted. The signals is notified by injected
> data abort fault.
>
> * The signals are fired and consumed in sequential fashion. It means
> no more signals will be fired if there is pending one, awaiting the
> guest to consume. It's because the injected data abort faults have
> to be done in sequential fashion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 43 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_para.h | 27 ++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 2 -
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 22 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 6 +
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 36 ++-
> virt/kvm/arm/async_pf.c | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c | 8 +
> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 29 ++-
> 11 files changed, 506 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/async_pf.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f77c706777ec..a207728d6f3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -250,6 +250,23 @@ struct vcpu_reset_state {
> bool reset;
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> +
> +/* Should be a power of two number */
> +#define ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU 64
What exactly is this number?
> +
> +/*
> + * The association of gfn and token. The token will be sent to guest as
> + * page fault address. Also, the guest could be in aarch32 mode. So its
> + * length should be 32-bits.
> + */
The length of what should be 32-bit? The token?
The guest sees the token as the fault address? How exactly is that
exposed to the guest, is that via a synthetic S1 fault?
> +struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
> + u32 token;
> + gfn_t gfn;
> + u32 esr;
> +};
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF */
> +
> struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> struct kvm_cpu_context ctxt;
> void *sve_state;
> @@ -351,6 +368,17 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u64 last_steal;
> gpa_t base;
> } steal;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + struct {
> + struct gfn_to_hva_cache cache;
> + gfn_t gfns[ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU];
> + u64 control_block;
> + u16 id;
> + bool send_user_only;
> + u64 no_fault_inst_range;
What are all of these fields? This implies functionality not covered
in the commit message, and it's not at all clear what these are.
For example, what exactly is `no_fault_inst_range`? If it's a range,
surely that needs a start/end or base/size pair rather than a single
value?
> + } apf;
> +#endif
> };
>
> /* Pointer to the vcpu's SVE FFR for sve_{save,load}_state() */
> @@ -604,6 +632,21 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void) {}
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> +bool kvm_async_pf_hash_find(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn);
> +bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 esr,
> + gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn);
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> +long kvm_async_pf_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF */
> +
> /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0ea481dd1c7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
> +
> +#include <uapi/asm/kvm_para.h>
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int kvm_arch_para_features(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int kvm_arch_para_hints(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_para_available(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
> index 602d137932dc..f66554cd5c45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
> @@ -1,3 +1 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -
> -generic-y += kvm_para.h
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e0bd0e579b9a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
> +#define _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF 0
> +
> +/* Async PF */
> +#define KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED (1 << 0)
> +#define KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS (1 << 1)
> +
> +#define KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT 1
> +#define KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_READY 2
> +
> +struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data {
> + __u32 reason;
> + __u8 pad[60];
> + __u32 enabled;
> +};
What's all the padding for?
> +
> +#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 449386d76441..1053e16b1739 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config KVM
> select KVM_VFIO
> select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + select KVM_ASYNC_PF
> select KVM_ARM_PMU if HW_PERF_EVENTS
> select HAVE_KVM_MSI
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index 5ffbdc39e780..3be24c1e401f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -37,3 +37,5 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-debug.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF) += $(KVM)/async_pf.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF) += $(KVM)/arm/async_pf.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index bdc0124a064a..22007dd3b9f0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
>
> /* KVM "vendor specific" services */
> #define ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES 0
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_APF 1
> #define ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES_2 127
> #define ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS 128
>
> @@ -102,6 +103,11 @@
> ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_VENDOR_HYP, \
> ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES)
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_APF_FUNC_ID \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_VENDOR_HYP, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_APF)
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 2cbb57485760..3f62899cef13 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> */
> r = 1;
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + case KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF:
> + r = 1;
> + break;
> +#endif
> default:
> r = kvm_arch_vm_ioctl_check_extension(kvm, ext);
> break;
> @@ -269,6 +274,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Force users to call KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT */
> vcpu->arch.target = -1;
> bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + vcpu->arch.apf.control_block = 0UL;
> + vcpu->arch.apf.no_fault_inst_range = 0x800;
Where has this magic number come from?
> +#endif
>
> /* Set up the timer */
> kvm_timer_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> @@ -426,8 +435,27 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> {
> bool irq_lines = *vcpu_hcr(v) & (HCR_VI | HCR_VF);
> - return ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v))
> - && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause);
> +
> + if ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v)) &&
> + !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause)
> + return true;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + if (v->arch.apf.control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED) {
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!list_empty_careful(&v->async_pf.done))
> + return true;
> +
> + ret = kvm_read_guest_cached(v->kvm, &v->arch.apf.cache,
> + &val, sizeof(val));
> + if (ret || val)
> + return true;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + return false;
> }
>
> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -683,6 +711,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>
> check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + kvm_check_async_pf_completion(vcpu);
> +#endif
Rather than adding ifdeffery like this, please add an empty stub for
when CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF isn't selected, so that this can be used
unconditionally.
> +
> /*
> * Preparing the interrupts to be injected also
> * involves poking the GIC, which must be done in a
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/arm/async_pf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5be49d684de3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/async_pf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Asynchronous Page Fault Support
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Red Hat, Inc., Gavin Shan
> + *
> + * Based on arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
> +
> +static inline u32 kvm_async_pf_hash_fn(gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + return hash_32(gfn & 0xffffffff, order_base_2(ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU));
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 kvm_async_pf_hash_next(u32 key)
> +{
> + return (key + 1) & (ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU; i++)
> + vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[i] = ~0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Add gfn to the hash table. It's ensured there is a free entry
> + * when this function is called.
> + */
> +static void kvm_async_pf_hash_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + u32 key = kvm_async_pf_hash_fn(gfn);
> +
> + while (vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[key] != ~0)
> + key = kvm_async_pf_hash_next(key);
> +
> + vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[key] = gfn;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 kvm_async_pf_hash_slot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + u32 key = kvm_async_pf_hash_fn(gfn);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU; i++) {
> + if (vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[key] == gfn ||
> + vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[key] == ~0)
> + break;
> +
> + key = kvm_async_pf_hash_next(key);
> + }
> +
> + return key;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_async_pf_hash_remove(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + u32 i, j, k;
> +
> + i = j = kvm_async_pf_hash_slot(vcpu, gfn);
> + while (true) {
> + vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[i] = ~0;
> +
> + do {
> + j = kvm_async_pf_hash_next(j);
> + if (vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[j] == ~0)
> + return;
> +
> + k = kvm_async_pf_hash_fn(vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[j]);
> + /*
> + * k lies cyclically in ]i,j]
> + * | i.k.j |
> + * |....j i.k.| or |.k..j i...|
> + */
> + } while ((i <= j) ? (i < k && k <= j) : (i < k || k <= j));
> +
> + vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[i] = vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[j];
> + i = j;
> + }
> +}
This looks like a copy-paste of code under arch/x86.
This looks like something that should be factored into common code
rather than duplicated. Do we not have an existing common hash table
implementation that we can use rather than building one specific to KVM
async page faults?
> +
> +bool kvm_async_pf_hash_find(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + u32 key = kvm_async_pf_hash_slot(vcpu, gfn);
> +
> + return vcpu->arch.apf.gfns[key] == gfn;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int kvm_async_pf_read_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *val)
> +{
> + return kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.apf.cache,
> + val, sizeof(*val));
> +}
> +
> +static inline int kvm_async_pf_write_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + return kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.apf.cache,
> + &val, sizeof(val));
> +}
> +
> +bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u64 vbar, pc;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!(vcpu->arch.apf.control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (vcpu->arch.apf.send_user_only && vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Pending page fault, which ins't acknowledged by guest */
> + ret = kvm_async_pf_read_cache(vcpu, &val);
> + if (ret || val)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Events can't be injected through data abort because it's
> + * going to clobber ELR_EL1, which might not consued (or saved)
> + * by guest yet.
> + */
> + vbar = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL1);
> + pc = *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> + if (pc >= vbar && pc < (vbar + vcpu->arch.apf.no_fault_inst_range))
> + return false;
Ah, so that's when this `no_fault_inst_range` is for.
As-is this is not sufficient, and we'll need t be extremely careful
here.
The vectors themselves typically only have a small amount of stub code,
and the bulk of the non-reentrant exception entry work happens
elsewhere, in a mixture of assembly and C code that isn't even virtually
contiguous with either the vectors or itself.
It's possible in theory that code in modules (or perhaps in eBPF JIT'd
code) that isn't safe to take a fault from, so even having a contiguous
range controlled by the kernel isn't ideal.
How does this work on x86?
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We need deliver the page present signal as quick as possible because
> + * it's performance critical. So the signal is delivered no matter which
> + * privilege level the guest has. It's possible the signal can't be handled
> + * by the guest immediately. However, host doesn't contribute the delay
> + * anyway.
> + */
> +bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u64 vbar, pc;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!(vcpu->arch.apf.control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED))
> + return true;
> +
> + /* Pending page fault, which ins't acknowledged by guest */
> + ret = kvm_async_pf_read_cache(vcpu, &val);
> + if (ret || val)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Events can't be injected through data abort because it's
> + * going to clobber ELR_EL1, which might not consued (or saved)
> + * by guest yet.
> + */
> + vbar = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VBAR_EL1);
> + pc = *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> + if (pc >= vbar && pc < (vbar + vcpu->arch.apf.no_fault_inst_range))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
Much of this is identical to the not_present case, so the same comments
apply. The common bits should probably be factored out into a helper.
> +
> +int kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 esr,
> + gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + struct kvm_arch_async_pf arch;
> + unsigned long hva = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva(vcpu, gfn);
> +
> + arch.token = (vcpu->arch.apf.id++ << 16) | vcpu->vcpu_id;
> + arch.gfn = gfn;
> + arch.esr = esr;
> +
> + return kvm_setup_async_pf(vcpu, gpa, hva, &arch);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * It's garanteed that no pending asynchronous page fault when this is
> + * called. It means all previous issued asynchronous page faults have
> + * been acknoledged.
> + */
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + kvm_async_pf_hash_add(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
> + ret = kvm_async_pf_write_cache(vcpu, KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT);
> + if (ret) {
> + kvm_err("%s: Error %d writing cache\n", __func__, ret);
> + kvm_async_pf_hash_remove(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kvm_inject_dabt(vcpu, work->arch.token);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * It's garanteed that no pending asynchronous page fault when this is
> + * called. It means all previous issued asynchronous page faults have
> + * been acknoledged.
> + */
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Broadcast wakeup */
> + if (work->wakeup_all)
> + work->arch.token = ~0;
> + else
> + kvm_async_pf_hash_remove(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
> +
> + ret = kvm_async_pf_write_cache(vcpu, KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_READY);
> + if (ret) {
> + kvm_err("%s: Error %d writing cache\n", __func__, ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kvm_inject_dabt(vcpu, work->arch.token);
So the guest sees a fake S1 abort with a fake address?
How is the guest expected to distinguish this from a real S1 fault?
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> + unsigned int esr = work->arch.esr;
> + phys_addr_t gpa = work->cr2_or_gpa;
> + gfn_t gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
Perhaps:
gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
> + unsigned long hva;
> + bool write_fault, writable;
> + int idx;
> +
> + /*
> + * We shouldn't issue prefault for special work to wake up
> + * all pending tasks because the associated token (address)
> + * is invalid.
> + */
I'm not sure what this comment is trying to say.
> + if (work->wakeup_all)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * The gpa was validated before the work is started. However, the
> + * memory slots might be changed since then. So we need to redo the
> + * validatation here.
> + */
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> +
> + write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(esr);
> + memslot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> + hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot_prot(memslot, gfn, &writable);
> + if (kvm_is_error_hva(hva) || (write_fault && !writable))
> + goto out;
> +
> + kvm_handle_user_mem_abort(vcpu, esr, memslot, gpa, hva, true);
> +
> +out:
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> +}
> +
> +static long kvm_async_pf_update_enable_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
> +{
> + bool enabled, enable;
> + gpa_t gpa = (data & ~0x3F);
What exactly is going on here? Why are the low 7 bits of data not valid?
This will also truncate the value to 32 bits; did you mean to do that?
> + int ret;
> +
> + enabled = !!(vcpu->arch.apf.control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED);
> + enable = !!(data & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED);
> + if (enable == enabled) {
> + kvm_debug("%s: Async PF has been %s (0x%llx -> 0x%llx)\n",
> + __func__, enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
> + vcpu->arch.apf.control_block, data);
> + return SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED;
> + }
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + ret = kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(
> + vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.apf.cache,
> + gpa + offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, reason),
> + sizeof(u32));
> + if (ret) {
> + kvm_err("%s: Error %d initializing cache on 0x%llx\n",
> + __func__, ret, data);
> + return SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + }
> +
> + kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(vcpu);
> + vcpu->arch.apf.send_user_only =
> + !(data & KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS);
> + kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all(vcpu);
> + vcpu->arch.apf.control_block = data;
> + } else {
> + kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
> + vcpu->arch.apf.control_block = data;
> + }
> +
> + return SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +long kvm_async_pf_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u64 data, func, val, range;
> + long ret = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> +
> + data = (smccc_get_arg2(vcpu) << 32) | smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
What prevents the high bits being set in arg1?
> + func = data & (0xfful << 56);
> + val = data & ~(0xfful << 56);
> + switch (func) {
> + case BIT(63):
> + ret = kvm_async_pf_update_enable_reg(vcpu, val);
Please give BIT(63) a mnemonic.
> + break;
> + case BIT(62):
Likewise.
> + if (vcpu->arch.apf.control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED) {
> + ret = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + range = vcpu->arch.apf.no_fault_inst_range;
> + vcpu->arch.apf.no_fault_inst_range = max(range, val);
Huh? How is the `no_fault_inst_range` set by he guest?
Thanks,
Mark.
> + break;
> + default:
> + kvm_err("%s: Unrecognized function 0x%llx\n", __func__, func);
> + ret = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> index db6dce3d0e23..a7e0fe17e2f1 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,15 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> break;
> case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
> val[0] = BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_APF);
> +#endif
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_APF_FUNC_ID:
> + val[0] = kvm_async_pf_hypercall(vcpu);
> + break;
> +#endif
> default:
> return kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 95aaabb2b1fc..a303815845a2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -1656,6 +1656,30 @@ static bool fault_supports_stage2_huge_mapping(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> (hva & ~(map_size - 1)) + map_size <= uaddr_end;
> }
>
> +static bool try_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 esr, gpa_t gpa,
> + gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, bool write,
> + bool *writable, bool prefault)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
> + bool async = false;
> +
> + /* Bail if *pfn has correct page */
> + *pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, gfn, false, &async, write, writable);
> + if (!async)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!prefault && kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_not_present(vcpu)) {
> + if (kvm_async_pf_hash_find(vcpu, gfn) ||
> + kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(vcpu, esr, gpa, gfn))
> + return true;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + *pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, gfn, false, NULL, write, writable);
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_handle_user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int esr,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> phys_addr_t fault_ipa, unsigned long hva,
> @@ -1737,7 +1761,10 @@ int kvm_handle_user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int esr,
> */
> smp_rmb();
>
> - pfn = gfn_to_pfn_prot(kvm, gfn, write_fault, &writable);
> + if (try_async_pf(vcpu, esr, fault_ipa, gfn, &pfn,
> + write_fault, &writable, prefault))
> + return 1;
> +
> if (pfn == KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON) {
> kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(hva, vma_shift);
> return 0;
> --
> 2.23.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists