[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01c5b299-be4b-3960-d7c1-338df08a2972@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:46:20 +0800
From: Jiping Ma <Jiping.Ma2@...driver.com>
To: will.deacon@....com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
bruce.ashfield@...il.com, yue.tao@...driver.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhe.he@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V3] arm64: perf: Get the wrong PC value in REGS_ABI_32
mode
Hi, Will
Please help to review the change.
Thanks,
Jiping
On 05/11/2020 10:52 AM, Jiping Ma wrote:
> Modified the patch subject and the change description.
>
> PC value is get from regs[15] in REGS_ABI_32 mode, but correct PC
> is regs->pc(regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_PC]) in arm64 kernel, which caused
> that perf can not parser the backtrace of app with dwarf mode in the
> 32bit system and 64bit kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@...driver.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index 0bbac61..0ef2880 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_PC)
> return regs->pc;
>
> + if (perf_reg_abi(current) == PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32
> + && idx == 15)
> + return regs->pc;
> +
> return regs->regs[idx];
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists