[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200526140027.GC24212@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:00:28 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
Cc: guoren@...ux.alibaba.com, vincent.chen@...ive.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmerdabbelt@...gle.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] ptrace: Use regset_size() for dynamic
regset size.
On 05/26, Greentime Hu wrote:
>
> @@ -882,13 +882,18 @@ static int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type,
> const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(task);
> const struct user_regset *regset = find_regset(view, type);
> int regset_no;
> + unsigned int size;
>
> - if (!regset || (kiov->iov_len % regset->size) != 0)
> + if (!regset)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> regset_no = regset - view->regsets;
> - kiov->iov_len = min(kiov->iov_len,
> - (__kernel_size_t) (regset->n * regset->size));
> + size = regset_size(task, regset);
> +
> + if ((kiov->iov_len % size) != 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
Hmm. this doesn't look right.
Before this patch we check "iov_len % regset->size", this is not the same
as "iov_len % regset_size()".
IOW, currently you can read/write, say, only the 1st register, you patch
breaks this?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists