[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUY7a5XGwcQQ511OeoTjOzWbrgF8BZdTrLDK09QWG4hwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:50:38 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in>,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from
compressed kernel
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation
> > destination on old linkers"?
> >
>
> It looks ok, but that patch (and even marking the other symbols .hidden)
> should be unnecessary after this series.
You mean _bss, _ebss and _end?
- Sedat -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists