[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200526152129.GS1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:21:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru, fancer.lancer@...il.com,
lars.povlsen@...rochip.com, Liang Jin J <liang.j.jin@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] spi: dw: add reset control
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:12:17AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Add mechanism to get the reset control and deassert it in order to bring
> the IP out of reset.
...
> struct clk *clk;
> struct clk *pclk;
> void *priv;
> + struct reset_control *rstc;
I think either you make it one space or you align all the rest members
accordingly. I would rather go with former.
...
> + /* find an optional reset controller */
> + dwsmmio->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "spi");
> + if (IS_ERR(dwsmmio->rstc)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(dwsmmio->rstc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return PTR_ERR(dwsmmio->rstc);
If it's other type of errors when reset control, we ignore them...
Why?!
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists