linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: magnetometer: ak8975: add gpio reset support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 19:11:37 +0200
From:   Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: magnetometer: ak8975: add gpio
 reset support

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:22:07AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:13 PM Jonathan Albrieux
> <jonathan.albrieux@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add reset-gpio support.
> >
> > Without reset's deassertion during ak8975_power_on(), driver's probe fails
> > on ak8975_who_i_am() while checking for device identity for AK09911 chip.
> >
> > AK09911 has an active low reset gpio to handle register's reset.
> > AK09911 datasheet says that, if not used, reset pin should be connected
> > to VID. This patch emulates this situation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@...il.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Thank you!!

Best regards,
Jonathan Albrieux