[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200526175330.GB377498@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:53:30 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] mm: memcg/slab: save obj_cgroup for non-root
slab objects
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:07:22PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 4/22/20 10:46 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > Store the obj_cgroup pointer in the corresponding place of
> > page->obj_cgroups for each allocated non-root slab object.
> > Make sure that each allocated object holds a reference to obj_cgroup.
> >
> > Objcg pointer is obtained from the memcg->objcg dereferencing
> > in memcg_kmem_get_cache() and passed from pre_alloc_hook to
> > post_alloc_hook. Then in case of successful allocation(s) it's
> > getting stored in the page->obj_cgroups vector.
> >
> > The objcg obtaining part look a bit bulky now, but it will be simplified
> > by next commits in the series.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> Nit below:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> > index 44def57f050e..525e09e05743 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.h
> > +++ b/mm/slab.h
> ...
> > @@ -636,8 +684,8 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
> > s->flags, flags);
> > }
> >
> > - if (memcg_kmem_enabled())
> > - memcg_kmem_put_cache(s);
> > + if (!is_root_cache(s))
> > + memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(s, objcg, size, p);
> > }
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_SLOB
>
> Keep also the memcg_kmem_enabled() static key check, like elsewhere?
>
Ok, will add, it can speed things up a little bit. My only concern is that
the code is not ready for memcg_kmem_enabled() turning negative after being positive.
But it's not a concern, right?
Actually, we can simplify memcg_kmem_enabled() mechanics and enable it
only once as soon as the first memcg is fully initialized. I don't think there
is any value in tracking the actual number of active memcgs.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists