linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: mmp-sspa: Fix return value check in asoc_mmp_sspa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <159059147354.50918.14800110942668588703.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 15:58:10 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: mmp-sspa: Fix return value check in asoc_mmp_sspa_probe()

On Wed, 27 May 2020 03:02:10 +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_ioremap() returns NULL pointer not
> ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check should be
> replaced with NULL test.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mmp-sspa: Fix return value check in asoc_mmp_sspa_probe()
      commit: 185457632ba344d3100e6bdd8ba839b959521813

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark