[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527152844.GA524990@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:28:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/81] 4.19.125-rc1 review
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:02:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:52:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.125 release.
> > There are 81 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 May 2020 18:36:22 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> Build results:
> total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 421 pass: 390 fail: 31
> Failed tests:
> <all alpha>
> <all sh>
> <all sheb>
>
> Bisect log (for alpha) below. Reverting the offending patch fixes the
> problem. Note that the problematic patch is associated with several
> other patches in the upstream kernel. Not all of them have a Fixes: tag,
> and I am not sure if all of them reference the problematic patch.
ah, I was worried about that patch. ugh. Ok, I'll drop it and make the
submitter send all of the fixups as well.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists