linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 18/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Make the PLLB registration function return a clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <be60ef4f29c929e633363a4473aa119f69ace7a0.1590594293.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 17:45:14 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 18/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Make the PLLB registration function return a clk_hw

The raspberrypi_register_pllb has been returning an integer so far to
notify whether the functions has exited successfully or not.

However, the OF provider functions in the clock framework require access to
the clk_hw structure so that we can expose those clocks to device tree
consumers.

Since we'll want that for the future clocks, let's return a clk_hw pointer
instead of the return code.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
index 19571602ba64..d2cb90c086a7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops raspberrypi_firmware_pll_clk_ops = {
 	.determine_rate = raspberrypi_pll_determine_rate,
 };
 
-static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
+static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 {
 	struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data;
 	struct clk_init_data init = {};
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 
 	data = devm_kzalloc(rpi->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!data)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	data->rpi = rpi;
 	data->id = RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID;
 
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s min freq: %d\n",
 			init.name, ret);
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
 	ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data,
@@ -222,13 +222,13 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s max freq: %d\n",
 			init.name, ret);
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
 	if (!min_rate || !max_rate) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Unexpected frequency range: min %u, max %u\n",
 			min_rate, max_rate);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
 	dev_info(rpi->dev, "CPU frequency range: min %u, max %u\n",
@@ -237,12 +237,14 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 	data->hw.init = &init;
 
 	ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &data->hw);
-	if (!ret)
-		clk_hw_set_rate_range(&data->hw,
-				      min_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE,
-				      max_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE);
+	if (ret)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
-	return ret;
+	clk_hw_set_rate_range(&data->hw,
+			      min_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE,
+			      max_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE);
+
+	return &data->hw;
 }
 
 static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = {
@@ -257,14 +259,14 @@ static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = {
 	},
 };
 
-static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
+static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize pllb_arm\n");
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_clk_hw_register_clkdev(rpi->dev,
@@ -272,10 +274,10 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 					  NULL, "cpu0");
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize clkdev\n");
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw;
 }
 
 static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
 	struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi;
-	int ret;
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
 
 	/*
 	 * We can be probed either through the an old-fashioned
@@ -314,15 +316,15 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rpi->firmware = firmware;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi);
 
-	ret = raspberrypi_register_pllb(rpi);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pllb, %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
+	hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb(rpi);
+	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pllb, %ld\n", PTR_ERR(hw));
+		return PTR_ERR(hw);
 	}
 
-	ret = raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(rpi);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(rpi);
+	if (IS_ERR(hw))
+		return PTR_ERR(hw);
 
 	rpi->cpufreq = platform_device_register_data(dev, "raspberrypi-cpufreq",
 						     -1, NULL, 0);
-- 
git-series 0.9.1