[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527154716.GC16490@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:47:16 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/15] perf/x86: Add perf text poke events
Em Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:56:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:40:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > PeterZ, from what we discussed for the next merge Window, perhaps we
> > should route the kernel bits via the tip tree while I will push the
> > tooling bits on my 5.8 merge request to Linus, Ok?
>
> Sure, I can take the kernel bits. Thanks!
So, I'm going thru the userpace bits and stopped at the patch copying
include/uapi/linux/perf_events.h to
tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_events.h to get the text_poke
perf_event_attr bit, looked at tip/ and this hasn't landed there yet,
any issues with the kernel bits?
I can try to put a separate branch, merge the kernel bits, and do a pull
request to Ingo/Thomas to get that going, would that help?
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists