linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] i2c: designware: Add Baytrail sem config DW I2C platform dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 18:55:33 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] i2c: designware: Add Baytrail sem config DW I2C
 platform dependency

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:30:41PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Currently Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore is a feature of the DW APB I2C
> platform driver. It's a bit confusing to see it's config in the menu at
> some separated place with no reference to the platform code. Let's move the
> config definition to be below the I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM config and mark
> it with "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" statement. By doing so the
> config menu will display the feature right below the DW I2C platform
> driver item and will indent it to the right so signifying its belonging.

Same comment as per previous version.

>  config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
>  	bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
>  	depends on ACPI
> +	depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>  	depends on (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m && IOSF_MBI) || \
>  		   (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && IOSF_MBI=y)

i.e. this change is not needed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko