lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:02:57 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm: add support for async page locking On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:01:07PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 5/26/20 3:59 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:51:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Normally waiting for a page to become unlocked, or locking the page, > >> requires waiting for IO to complete. Add support for lock_page_async() > >> and wait_on_page_locked_async(), which are callback based instead. This > > > > wait_on_page_locked_async() is actually in the next patch, requiring > > some back and forth to review. I wonder if this and the next patch > > could be merged to have the new API and callers introduced together? > > I'm fine with that, if that is preferable. Don't feel strongly about > that at all, just tried to do it as piecemeal as possible to make > it easier to review. Not worth sending a new iteration over, IMO.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists