linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Initialize tdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40800163-2b28-9879-f21b-687f89070c91@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 18:17:57 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+904752567107eefb728c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Initialize tdp_level during vCPU creation

On 27/05/20 10:54, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Initialize vcpu->arch.tdp_level during vCPU creation to avoid consuming
> garbage if userspace calls KVM_RUN without first calling KVM_SET_CPUID.
> 
> Fixes: e93fd3b3e89e9 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Capture TDP level when updating CPUID")
> Reported-by: syzbot+904752567107eefb728c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b226fb8abe41b..01a6304056197 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9414,6 +9414,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	fx_init(vcpu);
>  
>  	vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr = cpuid_query_maxphyaddr(vcpu);
> +	vcpu->arch.tdp_level = kvm_x86_ops.get_tdp_level(vcpu);
>  
>  	vcpu->arch.pat = MSR_IA32_CR_PAT_DEFAULT;

Queued, it is probably a good idea to add a selftests testcase for this
(it's even okay if it doesn't use the whole selftests infrastructure and
invokes KVM_CREATE_VM/KVM_CREATE_VCPU/KVM_RUN manually).

Paolo