[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527195303.GF23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 20:53:03 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sunhaoyl@...look.com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c: allocate initialized memory in
fill_thread_core_info()
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:04:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:38:17PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Folks, could you test the following?
> >
> > copy_xstate_to_kernel(): don't leave parts of destination uninitialized
> >
> > copy the corresponding pieces of init_fpstate into the gaps instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Am I taking this through tip (would prefer to as there's other FPU stuff
> pending) or should I ack this so that you can send it upwards?
Either way would work - I was going to send it to Linus tonight and an
extra Acked-by: would be welcome. OTOH, if you would rather have all
x86-related patches go through x86 git... your subtree, your rules.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists