[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200527201119.1692513-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 22:11:12 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce local_lock()
This is v3 of the local_lock() series. The v2 can be found at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200524215739.551568-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
v2…v3:
- Use `local_lock_t' instead of `struct local_lock' because it is
tiny data structure in general (similar to spinlock_t). Use also
consistent file names `local_lock.h'.
- Export the data structure in radix-tree so that the `lock' member
can be accessed externally. The common case of 'local_unlock()' (no
lockdep, no preemption) will then be optimized away. Otherwise
`idr_preload_end()' will be a function containing only a return
opcode.
- Reorganize the struct member names in mm/swap and connector/cn_proc.
- Make the `lock' member comes before the member that it aims to
protect.
- Two hunks from patch #6 appeared under mysteries circumstances in
patch #7. They have been moved back to patch #6.
Also applied comments to patch #7 as suggested by Ingo.
v1…v2:
- Remove static initializer so a local_lock is not used a single
per-CPU variable but a as a member of an existing structure, that is
used per-CPU.
- Use LD_WAIT_CONFIG as wait-type in the dep_map.
- Expect a pointer like value as argument (same as this_cpu_ptr()).
- Drop the SRCU patch. A different sollution is worked on.
- Drop the zswap patch. That code part will be reworked.
preempt_disable() and local_irq_disable/save() are in principle per CPU big
kernel locks. This has several downsides:
- The protection scope is unknown
- Violation of protection rules is hard to detect by instrumentation
- For PREEMPT_RT such sections, unless in low level critical code, can
violate the preemptability constraints.
To address this PREEMPT_RT introduced the concept of local_locks which are
strictly per CPU.
The lock operations map to preempt_disable(), local_irq_disable/save() and
the enabling counterparts on non RT enabled kernels.
If lockdep is enabled local locks gain a lock map which tracks the usage
context. This will catch cases where an area is protected by
preempt_disable() but the access also happens from interrupt context. local
locks have identified quite a few such issues over the years, the most
recent example is:
b7d5dc21072cd ("random: add a spinlock_t to struct batched_entropy")
Aside of the lockdep coverage this also improves code readability as it
precisely annotates the protection scope.
PREEMPT_RT substitutes these local locks with 'sleeping' spinlocks to
protect such sections while maintaining preemtability and CPU locality.
The followin series introduces the infrastructure including
documentation and provides a couple of examples how they are used to
adjust code to be RT ready.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists