lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 09:07:40 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn To: "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> Cc: kjlu@....edu, "Cezary Rojewski" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>, "Liam Girdwood" <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>, "Jie Yang" <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, "Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Allison Randal" <allison@...utok.net>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Alexios Zavras" <alexios.zavras@...el.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Fix runtime PM imbalance in sst_power_control > > this change doesn't seem quite right, if you look the code below there > is no PM imbalance, is there? > > int sst_pm_runtime_put(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv) > { > int ret; > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(sst_drv->dev); > ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(sst_drv->dev); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > return 0; > } You are right. Thank you for your correction! Regards, Dinghao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists