[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73fef900.d8158.17253abb08c.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 09:07:40 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To: "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kjlu@....edu, "Cezary Rojewski" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
"Jie Yang" <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Allison Randal" <allison@...utok.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Alexios Zavras" <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Fix runtime PM imbalance in
sst_power_control
>
> this change doesn't seem quite right, if you look the code below there
> is no PM imbalance, is there?
>
> int sst_pm_runtime_put(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(sst_drv->dev);
> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(sst_drv->dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> return 0;
> }
You are right. Thank you for your correction!
Regards,
Dinghao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists