linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] HID: multitouch: Remove MT_CLS_WIN_8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO-hwJJ=_2bn1BEshZ6URT813UAA6KRLaiEHt6bNPUcd9esskg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 11:24:13 +0200
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: multitouch: Remove MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:19 AM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 26, 2020, at 16:43, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> >>
> >>> After commit c23e2043d5f7 ("HID: multitouch: do not filter mice nodes"),
> >>> MT_CLS_WIN_8 also supports mouse nodes, hence make MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL
> >>> redundant.
> >>>
> >>> Remove MT_CLS_WIN_8_DUAL accordingly.
> >>
> >> Benjamin, can I get your Ack on this one please?
> >
> > Heh, funny enough I was trying to fix
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207235 and was pondering
> > this one too.
> >
> > To fix #207235, I'll likely need to add a new class and quirk in
> > hid-multitouch. I can't really find a generic solution for now, and we
> > better have a local quirk for the 2 devices we currently have and
> > backport those to stable. However, this patch will likely conflict
> > (trivially), with the new quirks, so I was thinking:
> > - submitting my quick and dirty quirk and mark it to stable
> > - apply this one on top of it (this one really doesn't need to go to stable)
> >
> > How does that sound?
>
> Sounds good. I'll resend this patch once your patch lands in the tree.

Great, thanks. Though I should be able to rebase it and push it
directly. I'll notify you if I can't get to it today.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> Kai-Heng
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Benjamin
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jiri Kosina
> >> SUSE Labs
> >>
> >
>