[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527113502.GD13537@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:35:02 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/5] Loongson Generic PCI v11
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:21:11PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> v11 fixes a minor style issue in patch 2.
>
> Now it have got enough ack,
> Thomas, cloud you please apply it to mips-next?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jiaxun Yang (5):
> PCI: Don't disable decoding when mmio_always_on is set
> PCI: Add Loongson PCI Controller support
> dt-bindings: Document Loongson PCI Host Controller
> MIPS: DTS: Loongson64: Add PCI Controller Node
> MIPS: Loongson64: Switch to generic PCI driver
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/loongson.yaml | 62 +++++
> arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/rs780e-pch.dtsi | 12 +
> arch/mips/loongson64/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/mips/loongson64/vbios_quirk.c | 29 ++
> arch/mips/pci/Makefile | 1 -
> arch/mips/pci/fixup-loongson3.c | 71 -----
> arch/mips/pci/ops-loongson3.c | 116 --------
> drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/pci/controller/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
> 12 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/loongson.yaml
> create mode 100644 arch/mips/loongson64/vbios_quirk.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pci/fixup-loongson3.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pci/ops-loongson3.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists