lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527142406.jzdtkbdb2q6st7e6@mobilestation>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 17:24:06 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] i2c: designware: Add Baytrail sem config DW I2C
 platform dependency

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:42:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:01:06PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Currently Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore is a feature of the DW APB I2C
> > platform driver. It's a bit confusing to see it's config in the menu at
> > some separated place with no reference to the platform code. Let's move the
> > config definition to be below the I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM config and mark
> > it with "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" statement. By doing so the
> > config menu will display the feature right below the DW I2C platform
> > driver item and will indent it to the right so signifying its belonging.
> 
> ...
> 

> >  config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
> >  	bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
> >  	depends on ACPI
> > +	depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> >  	depends on (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m && IOSF_MBI) || \
> >  		   (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && IOSF_MBI=y)
> 
> I didn't get this. What is broken now with existing dependencies?

With no explicit "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" the entry isn't right
shifted with respect to the I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM config entry in the kernel
menuconfig. So it looks like a normal no-yes driver without it. 

-Sergey

> 
> (The move of the PCI part is fine)
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ