lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528140946.965026756@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 16:05:40 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        a.darwish@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] lockdep: Prepare for NMI IRQ state tracking

There is no reason not to always, accurately, track IRQ state.

This change also makes IRQ state tracking ignore lockdep_off().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3646,7 +3646,13 @@ static void __trace_hardirqs_on_caller(v
  */
 void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
 {
-	if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion))
+	/*
+	 * NMIs do not (and cannot) track lock dependencies, nothing to do.
+	 */
+	if (in_nmi())
+		return;
+
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
 		return;
 
 	if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
@@ -3692,7 +3698,24 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigne
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 
-	if (unlikely(!debug_locks || curr->lockdep_recursion))
+	/*
+	 * NMIs can happen in the middle of local_irq_{en,dis}able() where the
+	 * tracking state and hardware state are out of sync.
+	 *
+	 * NMIs must save lockdep_hardirqs_enabled() to restore IRQ state from,
+	 * and not rely on hardware state like normal interrupts.
+	 */
+	if (in_nmi()) {
+		/*
+		 * Skip:
+		 *  - recursion check, because NMI can hit lockdep;
+		 *  - hardware state check, because above;
+		 *  - chain_key check, see lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare().
+		 */
+		goto skip_checks;
+	}
+
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
 		return;
 
 	if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
@@ -3720,6 +3743,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigne
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_chain_key !=
 			    current->curr_chain_key);
 
+skip_checks:
 	/* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
 	this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
 	curr->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
@@ -3735,7 +3759,10 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsign
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 
-	if (unlikely(!debug_locks || curr->lockdep_recursion))
+	/*
+	 * NMIs can happen in lockdep.
+	 */
+	if (!in_nmi() && DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
 		return;
 
 	/*


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ