[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3349efe-5291-637a-f98d-407a33f2fede@web.de>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:45:05 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()
> Yeah, regardless of who puts a wq the last time, the base reference is put
> by destroy_workqueue() and thus it's guaranteed that a wq can't be rcu freed
> without going through destroy_workqueue(). lol I'm undoing the revert.
* Would you like to add such background information to the change description?
* How do you think about integrate a following patch version after
the extra clarification?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists