lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:45:05 +0200 From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq() > Yeah, regardless of who puts a wq the last time, the base reference is put > by destroy_workqueue() and thus it's guaranteed that a wq can't be rcu freed > without going through destroy_workqueue(). lol I'm undoing the revert. * Would you like to add such background information to the change description? * How do you think about integrate a following patch version after the extra clarification? Regards, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists