lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3349efe-5291-637a-f98d-407a33f2fede@web.de>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 16:45:05 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

> Yeah, regardless of who puts a wq the last time, the base reference is put
> by destroy_workqueue() and thus it's guaranteed that a wq can't be rcu freed
> without going through destroy_workqueue(). lol I'm undoing the revert.

* Would you like to add such background information to the change description?

* How do you think about integrate a following patch version after
  the extra clarification?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ