linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] Add support for replicators which loses context on clock removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 08:48:03 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] Add support for replicators which loses context on
 clock removal

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:15:53AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:06:50AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > This series is mainly to add support for replicators
> > which lose context on removing AMBA clock like on SC7180
> > SoC where replicator in AOSS domain loses context.
> > 
> 
> I am good with this set but need a reviewed-by on the DT binding before I can
> add it to my tree.  The same goes for your other set[1].

Then why is it already in linux-next?

In any case,

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>