lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPOu2rduGN-jbpMi77vsfz2J5q-EPfkvHqr48K9DEcmSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 17:30:44 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/kcsan 12/12] /bin/bash: line 1: 61526 Segmentation
 fault sparse ...

On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 17:22, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > Ouch. The below should be all we need, assuming it's the best we can do
> > for sparse right now.
>
> Upstream sparse should be OK with it now.

Very good, thank you! For 5.8 we probably still want the ifdef
__CHECKER__, otherwise we might break too many existing workflows. But
hopefully we can remove it again at some point. At the latest when the
kernel deprecates GCC 4.8 support, because then we can just remove the
whole unoptimized __unqual_scalar_typeof() definition.

Thanks,
-- Marco

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ