[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528161416.GY1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:14:16 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:46:00PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [adding Linus]
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:35:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Any progress on this? I plan to resend the sh dma-mapping I've been
> > trying to get upstream for a year again, and they would conflict,
> > so I could look into rebasing them first.
>
> So for years now it has been close to and in the end impossible to
> provoke sh maintainer action. At the same point hardware is pretty much
> long gone for the real commercial variants, and never took off for the
> open hardware nommu variant.
>
> Linus, would you ok with a 5.8 pull request to just kill off arch/sh/?
It is in active use. Please do not act on such a request. I would be
much quicker to ack things that actually need ack if I weren't CC'd on
hundreds of random non-arch-specific changes that don't need it, but I
understand that's how the kernel process works. If there are things
that need ack please feel free to ping.
Note that I specifically acked and requested the sh5 removal.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists