[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528161616.GK2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:16:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] x86/idt: Consolidate idt functionality
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, debug_idt_ctr);
> -static __always_inline bool is_debug_idt_enabled(void)
> -{
> - if (this_cpu_read(debug_idt_ctr))
> - return true;
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline void load_debug_idt(void)
> -{
> - load_idt((const struct desc_ptr *)&debug_idt_descr);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline bool is_debug_idt_enabled(void)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void load_debug_idt(void)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
I have a patch that does this too; except it doesn't put it back. I like
that one better :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists