linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix retry logic in f2fs_write_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d54379e-35c7-76e0-0c8a-d89bfcecb935@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 10:45:43 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix retry logic in f2fs_write_cache_pages()

On 2020/5/27 10:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> In case a compressed file is getting overwritten, the current retry
> logic doesn't include the current page to be retried now as it sets
> the new start index as 0 and new end index as writeback_index - 1.
> This causes the corresponding cluster to be uncompressed and written
> as normal pages without compression. Fix this by allowing writeback to
> be retried for the current page as well (in case of compressed page
> getting retried due to index mismatch with cluster index). So that
> this cluster can be written compressed in case of overwrite.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 4af5fcd..bfd1df4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -3024,7 +3024,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	if ((!cycled && !done) || retry) {

IMO, we add retry logic in wrong place, you can see that cycled value is
zero only if wbc->range_cyclic is true, in that case writeback_index is valid.

However if retry is true and wbc->range_cyclic is false, then writeback_index
would be uninitialized variable.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

>  		cycled = 1;
>  		index = 0;
> -		end = writeback_index - 1;
> +		end = retry ? -1 : writeback_index - 1;
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
>  	if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
>