linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] mm/memory.c: Update local TLB if PTE entry exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200528122342.11e51dd9c7698d68632f2a81@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 12:23:42 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Korotin <dkorotin@...ecomp.com>,
        Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] mm/memory.c: Update local TLB if PTE entry
 exists

On Wed, 27 May 2020 10:25:18 +0800 Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:

> If two threads concurrently fault at the same page, the thread that
> won the race updates the PTE and its local TLB. For now, the other
> thread gives up, simply does nothing, and continues.
> 
> It could happen that this second thread triggers another fault, whereby
> it only updates its local TLB while handling the fault. Instead of
> triggering another fault, let's directly update the local TLB of the
> second thread. Function update_mmu_tlb is used here to update local
> TLB on the second thread, and it is defined as empty on other arches.
> 
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,7 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  		new_page = old_page;
>  		page_copied = 1;
>  	} else {
> +		update_mmu_tlb(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
>  		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
>  	}
>  

When applying your patches on top of the -mm tree's changes, the above
hunk didn't apply.  The entire `else' block was removed by
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-convert-anon-and-file-thp-to-new-mem_cgroup_charge-api.patch

I assumed that dropping this hunk was appropriate.  Please check?