linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 kunit-next 2/2] kunit: add support for named resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g46uNRwDnKHjukU2gBu6wM0kzBragaWBJigbfJkFuQvsFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 12:47:43 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 kunit-next 2/2] kunit: add support for named resources

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:46 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> The kunit resources API allows for custom initialization and
> cleanup code (init/fini); here a new resource add function sets
> the "struct kunit_resource" "name" field, and calls the standard
> add function.  Having a simple way to name resources is
> useful in cases such as multithreaded tests where a set of
> resources are shared among threads; a pointer to the
> "struct kunit *" test state then is all that is needed to
> retrieve and use named resources.  Support is provided to add,
> find and destroy named resources; the latter two are simply
> wrappers that use a "match-by-name" callback.
>
> If an attempt to add a resource with a name that already exists
> is made kunit_add_named_resource() will return -EEXIST.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>

FYI, I already gave a reviewed-by for this commit back in v1, so:

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>