[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528221822.icstykoyppbeznzs@master>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 22:18:22 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: simplify get_count_order_long()
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:05:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Wed, 27 May 2020 22:45:42 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> /* a tiny module only meant to test get_count_order/long */
>> unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
>> {0x00000003, 2},
>> {0x00000004, 2},
>> {0x00001fff, 13},
>> {0x00002000, 13},
>> {0x50000000, 32},
>> {0x80000000, 32},
>> };
>>
>> static int __init test_getorder_startup(void)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
>> if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order(order_comb[i][0]))
>> pr_warn("get_count_order wrong for %lx\n",
>> order_comb[i][0]);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Since I don't get a way to iterate all the possibilities, some random
>> combination is chosen. Is this one looks good?
>
>Looks good.
>
>You might want to add a less-negative number as well? 0x80030000.
>Something that won't turn positive if it has 1 subtracted from it.
Thanks, this is a good suggestion.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists