linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.6 086/126] virtio-balloon: Revert "virtio-balloon: Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 07:51:00 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.6 086/126] virtio-balloon: Revert "virtio-balloon:
 Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM"

On 26. 05. 20, 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 835a6a649d0dd1b1f46759eb60fff2f63ed253a7 ]
> 
> This reverts commit 5a6b4cc5b7a1892a8d7f63d6cbac6e0ae2a9d031.
> 
> It has been queued properly in the akpm tree, this version is just
> creating conflicts.

Should this be applied to stable trees at all?

To me, it occurs to be a revert to avoid conflicts, not to fix something?

> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs