linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: Revert "tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200528065527.GE188849@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 09:55:27 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@...il.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jeffrin Jose T <jeffrin@...agiritech.edu.in>,
        Alex Guzman <alex@...man.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Revert "tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING
 mode"

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:40:25PM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 5/27/20 5:30 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >> This won't help if the message is read by an async tcti. If the problem lies
> >> in the chip get locality code, perhaps this could help to debug the root-cause
> >> instead of masking it out in the upper layer code:
> > What is TCTI and async TCTI? Not following.
> 
> TPM Command Transmission Interface (TCTI) as defined by TCG in
> https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tss-tcti-specification/
> 
> the reason we added the O_NONBLOCK mode was to satisfy the TCG spec for async TCTI.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tadeusz

OK, thanks recalling.

/Jarkko