lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528074442.GB790247@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 09:44:42 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] coredump infoleak fix


* Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:02:55AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Looks good to me.
> > 
> > I'm wondering, shouldn't we also zero-initialize the dump data to 
> > begin with? See the patch below (untested).
> 
> Note that this hides the bug from KASAN, though ;-)  And the bug
> is not just infoleak - not all components are "all zeroes" in the
> init state.

Yeah, but is zero-init really a problem though? Wouldn't it be 
'better' to have all zeroes if the dump doesn't fit? But I might be 
missing something ...

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ