[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f292007-4da0-3558-4c6b-ca3eaf884193@web.de>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 10:07:48 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in
rcu_free_wq()
> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Co-developed-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
I guess that this tag should usually trigger another consequence like the following.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b0c3ba31be3e45a130e13b278cf3b90f69bda6f6#n548
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Is there a need to tag also the patch review contribution of Lai Jiangshan?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJhGHyC4XcNL8yzWZKZ=73wZJej4JwCaAHGV8qjYn-AqcEAEjQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1442889/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/201
I am unsure if such aspects will matter after Tejun Heo responded with the information
“Applied to wq/for-5.8.” to the previous patch version yesterday.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527135214.GI83516@mtj.thefacebook.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1443888/
> v1->v2->v3->v4->v5->v6:
> Modify weakly submitted information and tag.
I am curious how our imaginations and preferences will evolve further
also for such wording selections.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists