[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528183115.05b2519a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:31:15 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: devicetree-compiler@...r.kernel.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checks: Improve i2c reg property checking
Hi Joel,
On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:50:37 +0930 Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
>
>
> #define I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS (1 << 30)
> +#define I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS (1 << 31)
>
> static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct node *node)
> {
> @@ -1057,10 +1058,13 @@ static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct node
> reg = fdt32_to_cpu(*(cells++));
> /* Ignore I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS */
> reg &= ~I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS;
> - if (reg > 0x3ff)
> +
> + if ((reg & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) && reg > 0x3ff)
Shouldn't this be
if ((reg & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) && ((reg & ~I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) > 0x3ff))
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists