linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200528083923.yjlm5ur7cslgxdau@mobilestation>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 11:39:23 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from
 the DW I2C example

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:56:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:18:41PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:12:04AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:01:02PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> > > > i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning:
> > > > 
> > > > Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@...0000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064"
> > > > Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@...0000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
> > > > 
> > > > In order to silence dtc up let's discard the flag from the DW I2C DT
> > > > binding example for now. Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.
> 
> > > >        eeprom@64 {
> > > >          compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
> > > > -        reg = <0x40000064>;
> > > > +        reg = <0x64>;
> > > 
> > > But the compatible is a slave, so you need an example with a different 
> > > device.
> > 
> 
> > Ok. I'll replace the sub-node with just "atmel,24c02" compatible string then.
> 
> But how it will be different to the another slave connected to the master?
> 
> This example is specifically to show that DesingWare I²C controller may be
> switched to slave mode.

Well, dtc doesn't support it and prints warning that the address is invalid.
Though I do understand you concern and is mostly agree with it. Let's do this in
the next way. I'll resend the series with eeprom@64 sub-node replaced with just
a normal eeprom-device. The message log will have an info why this has been
done. In the non-mergeable section of the patch I'll suggest to Rob reconsider
the patch acking, since we can leave the slave-marked sub-node and just live
with the dtc warning until it's fixed in there.

-Sergey

> 
> > > >        };
> > > >      };
> > > >    - |
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>