linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 09:12:52 +0900
From:   Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@...il.com>
To:     Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        'Namjae Jeon' <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
        "'Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp'" 
        <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
Cc:     "'Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp'" 
        <Mori.Takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
        "'Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp'" 
        <Motai.Hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
        'Namjae Jeon' <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache

>>>   > In order to prevent illegal accesses to bh and dentries, it would
>>> be better to check validation for num and bh.
>>>
>>>   There is no new error checking for same reason as above.
>>>
>>>   I'll try to add error checking to this v2 patch.
>>>   Or is it better to add error checking in another patch?
>> The latter:)
>> Thanks!
> 
> Yes, the latter looks better.

I will do so.

I will post additional patches for error checking, after this patch is merged into tree.
OK?