lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 17:25:05 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: suppress false positive last_block warning

On 2020/5/28 16:48, Gao Xiang wrote:
> As Andrew mentioned, some rare specific gcc versions could report
> last_block uninitialized warning. Actually last_block doesn't need
> to be uninitialized first from its implementation due to bio == NULL
> condition. After a bio is allocated, last_block will be assigned
> then.
> 
> The detailed analysis is in this thread [1]. So let's silence those
> confusing gccs simply.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421072839.GA13867@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ