[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528192943.2bb04a5e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 19:29:43 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the mips
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
mm/memory.c
between commit:
7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB if PTE entry exists")
from the mips tree and commit:
e325f89fdd69 ("mm: memcontrol: convert anon and file-thp to new mem_cgroup_charge() API")
from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc mm/memory.c
index c7c8960bdd1e,8d52a91d707b..000000000000
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@@ -2752,9 -2748,6 +2749,8 @@@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct v
/* Free the old page.. */
new_page = old_page;
page_copied = 1;
+ } else {
+ update_mmu_tlb(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
- mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
}
if (new_page)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists