[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528104916.GD3115014@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:49:16 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:22:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 3828026c9ec8 ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings")
>
> from the devicetree tree and commits:
>
> cd4b54e2ae1f ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I guessed, taking most changes from the former) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Sounds good,t hanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists