[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528112401.GA3174440@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:24:01 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.6 086/126] virtio-balloon: Revert "virtio-balloon:
Switch back to OOM handler for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM"
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:11:17AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:21:41AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 28.05.20 07:51, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 26. 05. 20, 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > > >
> > > > [ Upstream commit 835a6a649d0dd1b1f46759eb60fff2f63ed253a7 ]
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit 5a6b4cc5b7a1892a8d7f63d6cbac6e0ae2a9d031.
> > > >
> > > > It has been queued properly in the akpm tree, this version is just
> > > > creating conflicts.
> > >
> > > Should this be applied to stable trees at all?
> > >
> > > To me, it occurs to be a revert to avoid conflicts, not to fix something?
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> Right, I'll drop it - thank you.
Already committed, I'll go revert this now, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists