linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgX5n=0OEi7hMrmgVZGD=orGpgvkyLrhmXVKSFYdBJ+eUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 22:02:31 +1000
From:   Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Wen Gong <wgong@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain"

Hi Brian,

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:18 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit 2dc016599cfa9672a147528ca26d70c3654a5423.
>
> Users are reporting regressions in regulatory domain detection and
> channel availability.
>
> The problem this was trying to resolve was fixed in firmware anyway:

Should we tell the user their firmware needs to be upgraded if it
reports this regulatory domain instead of completely dropping support
for it?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/