lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159067091851.53762.1508093910500624788.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 14:02:12 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao 
        <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Alexander.Deucher@....com,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: Removing unnecessary instance initialization

On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:16 +0530, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:
> In DMA pointer the initialzation of instance is of no use.
> In fact it will reinitialize the instance variable which is already
> opened and functional.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: amd: Removing unnecessary instance initialization
      commit: 4a0434502191347ba8f99468f2fb2cdddc20d381

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ