lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f7a41d6-325d-3731-0a6a-fa2e41d4e33a@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 14:22:52 +0100
From:   Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To:     Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] drm/panfrost: use device_property_present to check
 for OPP

On 10/05/2020 17:55, Clément Péron wrote:
> Instead of expecting an error from dev_pm_opp_of_add_table()
> do a simple device_property_present() check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>

I'm not sure I understand why this is better. We seem to have more code 
to do roughly the same thing just with the hard-coded 
"operating-points-v2" name (if there's ever a 'v3' we'll then have to 
update this).

Is the desire just to get an error on probe if the table is malformed? 
Have you hit this situation? If so this sounds like something which 
would be better fixed in the generic OPP code rather than Panfrost itself.

Steve

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> index d9007f44b772..fce21c682414 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> @@ -96,15 +96,19 @@ int panfrost_devfreq_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>   	struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling;
>   	struct panfrost_devfreq *pfdevfreq = &pfdev->pfdevfreq;
>   
> -	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> -	if (ret == -ENODEV) /* Optional, continue without devfreq */
> +	if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2"))
> +		/* Optional, continue without devfreq */
>   		return 0;
> -	else if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -	pfdevfreq->opp_of_table_added = true;
>   
>   	spin_lock_init(&pfdevfreq->lock);
>   
> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Couldn't add OPP table\n");
> +		goto err_fini;
> +	}
> +	pfdevfreq->opp_of_table_added = true;
> +
>   	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdevfreq);
>   
>   	cur_freq = clk_get_rate(pfdev->clock);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ