[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529174314.GB20540@kozik-lap>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:43:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, peron.clem@...il.com,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: samsung: Add simple voltage coupler for
Exynos5800
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:49:40PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Add custom voltage regulator coupler for Exynos5800 SoCs, which require
> coupling between "vdd_arm" and "vdd_int" regulators. This coupler ensures
> that coupled regulators voltage balancing is done only when clients for
> each regulator (cpufreq for "vdd_arm" and devfreq for "vdd_int") apply
> their constraints, so the voltage values don't go beyond the
> bootloader-selected operation point during the boot process. This also
> ensures proper voltage balancing if any of those drivers is missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> .../soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> index 76838255b5fa..f185cd3d4c62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5800
> bool "Samsung EXYNOS5800"
> default y
> depends on SOC_EXYNOS5420
> + select EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER
>
> config EXYNOS_MCPM
> bool
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> index c7a2003687c7..264185664594 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -37,4 +37,7 @@ config EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS
> bool "Exynos PM domains" if COMPILE_TEST
> depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS || COMPILE_TEST
>
> +config EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER
> + bool "Exynos SoC Regulator Coupler" if COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> index edd1d6ea064d..ecc3a32f6406 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU) += exynos-pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS) += exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \
> exynos5250-pmu.o exynos5420-pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER) += exynos-regulator-coupler.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..54445918bd75
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + * Author: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> + *
> + * Samsung Exynos SoC voltage coupler
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/coupler.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> +
> +static int exynos_coupler_balance_voltage(struct regulator_coupler *coupler,
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + suspend_state_t state)
> +{
> + struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
> + int ret, cons_uV = 0, cons_max_uV = INT_MAX;
> + bool skip_coupled = false;
> +
> + /* get coupled regulator constraints */
> + ret = regulator_check_consumers(c_desc->coupled_rdevs[1], &cons_uV,
> + &cons_max_uV, state);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* skip adjusting coupled regulator if it has no constraints set yet */
> + if (cons_uV == 0)
> + skip_coupled = true;
> +
> + return regulator_do_balance_voltage(rdev, state, skip_coupled);
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_coupler_attach(struct regulator_coupler *coupler,
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + if (strcmp(rdev_get_name(rdev), "vdd_arm") == 0 ||
> + strcmp(rdev_get_name(rdev), "vdd_int") == 0)
Thanks for the patch!
You hard-coded specific names of regulators existing
only in DTS. They do not come from any driver nor bindings, therefore
they could change making driver unusable. Someone could add a new DTS
with different names and expect this to work as well.
You need bindings for this. Something like:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nvidia,tegra-regulators-coupling.txt
But better in YAML, if possible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists