[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529175350.2wtoqttipa354m2m@wunner.de>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:53:50 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835: Enable shared interrupt support
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:46:01AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/29/20 10:43 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:58:04PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835.c
> >> @@ -379,6 +379,10 @@ static irqreturn_t bcm2835_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >> if (bs->tx_len && cs & BCM2835_SPI_CS_DONE)
> >> bcm2835_wr_fifo_blind(bs, BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE);
> >>
> >> + /* check if we got interrupt enabled */
> >> + if (!(bcm2835_rd(bs, BCM2835_SPI_CS) & BCM2835_SPI_CS_INTR))
> >> + return IRQ_NONE;
> >> +
> >> /* Read as many bytes as possible from FIFO */
> >> bcm2835_rd_fifo(bs);
> >> /* Write as many bytes as possible to FIFO */
[...]
> > Finally, it would be nice if the check would be optimized away when
> > compiling for pre-RasPi4 products, maybe something like:
> >
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_LPAE) && !(cs & BCM2835_SPI_CS_INTR))
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
>
> Rather than keying this off ARM_LPAE or any other option, this should be
> keyed off a compatible string, that way we can even conditionally pass
> IRQF_SHARED to the interrupt handler if we care so much about performance.
But a compatible string can't be checked at compile time, can it?
The point is that at the least the Foundation compiles and ships a separate
kernel for each of the three platforms BCM2835, BCM2837, BCM2711. It's
unnecessary to check whether an interrupt was actually raised if we *know*
in advance that it's not shared (as is the case with kernels compiled for
BCM2835 and BCM2837).
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists