[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529191749.GA2784431@bogus>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:17:49 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Convert DW I2C slave to the
DW I2C master example
On Thu, 28 May 2020 12:33:12 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg" property. If dtc finds an i2c-slave sub-node having an address
> higher than ten-bits wide it'll print an ugly warning:
>
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@...0000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064"
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@...0000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
>
> In order to silence dtc up let's replace the corresponding DT binding
> example with a normal DW I2C master mode-based one. It's done by clearing
> the I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS bit in the reg property and converting the
> sub-node to be compatible with normal EEPROM like "atmel,24c02".
>
> Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
>
> Rob, even though you asked for such modification, it might be a better to
> just ignore the warning until dtc is properly fixed. Andy and me agree
> with that. If you are also on the same side with us, just explicitly nack
> this patch so Jarkko or Wolfram would ignore it when merging in the series.
>
> Changelog v3:
> - This is a new patch created as a result of the Rob request to remove
> the EEPROM-slave bit setting in the DT binndings example until the dtc
> is fixed.
>
> Changelog v6:
> - Replace the "linux,slave-24c02" compatible string with "atmel,24c02" one
> so the example would be perceived as a normal DW I2C master mode.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists